Five pollsters released new Texas polling between Sunday and today covering the races happening here in Texas.
Below are most of the Texas polls released since Saturday night.
US Senate: Ken Paxton (R) vs. James Talarico (D)
Research Co. (Oct. 31 to Nov. 2; released Nov. 2; 450 likely voters; MoE ±4.6): Talarico 51%, Paxton 48%. Research Co. release
Trafalgar Group (R) (Oct. 31 to Nov. 1; released Nov. 1; 1,089 likely voters; MoE ±2.9): Paxton 48.1%, Talarico 47.5%, Libertarian Ted Brown 2.4%, undecided 2.0%. Trafalgar report
AtlasIntel (Oct. 28 to Nov. 1; released Nov. 1; 1,678 respondents, target population listed as Texas adults; MoE ±2): Talarico 51.3%, Paxton 45.4%, other 1.5%, don’t know 1.1%, would not vote 0.7%. AtlasIntel report
New York Times/Siena (Oct. 27 to Nov. 1; released Nov. 1; 1,215 likely voters; MoE ±3.3 per USA Today): Talarico 50%, Paxton 43%. USA Today on NYT/Siena
YouGov (Oct. 26 to 29; posted Nov. 1; 2,141 likely voters; MoE ±2.9): Talarico 51%, Paxton 47%, someone else 1%, not sure 1%, would not vote 1%. Leaners included. YouGov toplines
Governor: Greg Abbott (R) vs. Gina Hinojosa (D)
Research Co. (same survey): Abbott 50%, Hinojosa 48%.
AtlasIntel (same survey): Hinojosa 49.2%, Abbott 47.6%, other 1.3%, don’t know 1.2%, would not vote 0.7%.
New York Times/Siena (same survey): Hinojosa 48%, Abbott 47%.
YouGov (same survey): Abbott 50%, Hinojosa 49%, someone else 1%, not sure 0%, would not vote 1%.
U.S. House, generic ballot in Texas
AtlasIntel (same survey): Democratic candidate 48.0%, Republican candidate 47.4%, don’t know 2.0%, other 1.6%, would not vote 1.0%.
Job approval in Texas
AtlasIntel (same survey): Trump 44% approve, 53% disapprove. Abbott 43/53. Sen. Ted Cruz 45/53. Sen. John Cornyn 17/67, with 16% don’t know.
YouGov (same survey): Trump 30% strongly approve, 15% somewhat approve, 4% somewhat disapprove, 50% strongly disapprove, 1% not sure.










Honestly, after the polls had Clinton beating Trump by 98% or higher in the 2016 presidential election, why would anyone give even the slightest amount of credence to polls? The "results" cannot be verified, and they are just fodder so that dying media can have some content about which to comment in their desperate pleas to remain relevant, since they sure as hell ain't proven themselves to be trustworthy.
Faker and gayer than a Brian Harrison gay sex bill.