Parents Defeat Perverts in Fredericksburg ISD
Now for some good news
Finally, something positive to write on. Two days ago, Fredericksburg ISD (FISD) met to discuss a question with an obvious answer: should porn books be allowed in school libraries? Parents were mostly victorious, with FISD finally creating formal procedures for purging “pervasively vulgar” books.
This was not an easy victory however. It took numerous parents coming forward, exposing the depravity children were allowed access to. Sections of the books desensitize youth to incest, rape, pedophilia, and sexual promiscuity in general.
The often successful tactic used by our schoolhouse heros was reading excerpts from these rags to showcase what’s drummed into kid’s heads. At the above video’s 11:30 mark for instance, parent, twenty-year Navy veteran, and licensed trauma counselor Jeremy Simon expressed his displeasure over the book, Crank (slang for meth), which gives explicit depictions of rape and drug use:
“It went with an audible tear. It mushroomed into agony, and all I could do is go stiff. “You aren’t lying bitch.” I lay there sobbing as he worked, sweated over me. Stoked by the monster, it took him a long time to finish. ‘Give me a line!’ ‘I’ll give you an encore!’ He pulled away, sticky and bloody, throbbing inside his elbow. I didn’t move. I didn’t dare look him in the eye.”
Skipping to the end, the Asst. Superintendent Robyn Derington stated the porn books in question are officially removed for review by the board. How decent the board is will be discovered soon.
The FISD board voted 7-0 to establish procedures banning pervert literature from schools, allowing school officials to purge books defined as “pervasively vulgar.” While it’s concerning power will be put in school official’s hands, who’s leanings toward degeneracy are unknown, it is encouraging FISD did something to cleanse its schools, and didn’t cut parents off claiming the same material they allowed for children was “inappropriate” for school board meetings.
There were however, a few likely child groomers asserting it’s acceptable to put porn in a minor’s hands.
I won’t dignify these debauchees, weirdos, and subversives by stating their names, but I will explain their “arguments.”
One commonality, was claiming the magic gowns on the Supreme Court wouldn’t approve, citing cases where Judicial power grab was exercised, and courts intervened in school board affairs. Nevermind that pornographic content falls under “obscene” material. Besides, SCOTUS makes up nonsense legislating from the bench, and changes it’s mind about every fifty years; case and point segregation.
The other two arguments were that banning these books was intolerant, creating an “unwelcoming” environment, and that grooming kids via porn books is somehow free speech. I highly doubt our framers had pederasts in mind when crafting the First Amendment. What’s so great about “tolerance” and “acceptance” anyways? It’s resulted in perverts loosed upon society, our borders opened and flooded by the Third World, millions of dead babies killed via abortion, and children being taught to hate themselves, their families, faith and nation, and believing their mental disorder constitutes a new gender.
Contrary to Leftist and Libertarian claims (Libertarians are just Democrats minus tax hikes), promoting deviancy to kids is not free speech. Legally, that’s called child grooming and promoting the delinquency of a minor. Unless their goal is kid-diddling, I don’t see why they would think protecting Texan youth isn’t a priority. Fredericksburg ISD does, and they deserve praise for their actions.
If you have no problem with school perversions, and you think protecting children is “none of the government’s business,” then there’s nothing I can say to you. May God have mercy on your soul.