Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nate L's avatar

I am generally in favor of throwing in with the conspiracy retard right, because we need the votes (nationally). People don't remember what it was like prior to Trump, when these guys would either vote Democrat or more likely not vote at all. We simply don't have a winning coalition (nationally) without them, and I am happy to ally with them at the cost of nonsense like Candace or an 85-IQ grassroots. There is a different archetype of voter that exists in the rust belt that does not exist here to any meaningful extent, and some of the "dumb" stuff hits differently up there.

However, we wouldn't have to do that here, because the GOP majority is strong enough to run a more effective and boring candidate and win. In fact, in this state our boring guys tend to overperform Trump, so it could work, but I think the same sort of retarded circus acts that carry the day (nationally) bleed over here too, and I would still gladly make the trade even if it affects us here in the ways outlined above. But I also think it is good to call it out.

The political landscape is due to significantly change in 2030, when thanks to electoral reapportionment, we arguably don't even need the blue wall states at all anymore (assuming we'd keep Ohio or revert back to winning VA), and after this point we may revert back to saner candidates without the conspiritard baggage in the mold of Kemp or Youngkin, assuming we can withstand the inevitable Democrat attempt to change the rules at the last minute. But one valid point of criticism on the part of the tards was that respectable politicians got us nowhere for so long, so I don't even know if that would be a good thing.

Right now I am just happy we have Trump, and we'll take the bad with the good.

Based Jackson's avatar

Re: Tommy's issue with school choice: the issue isn't with school choice, though. It's with immigration. If you don't want Islamic schools, then push harder on immigration issues, not school choice.

I have my own issues with the school choice program, but it's mostly around the fact that the voucher, in terms of $ value, may as well be $0. True school choice would result in vouchers valued at the actual cost per student, which is almost certainly much higher than the $2k(?) vouchers that they're doing now.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?