Four lawyers? That's a lot of billable hours to explain to a judge why you weren't personally capable of impregnating your beautiful wife. Hi Steven and Steven's office. I bet Current Revolt will protect your anonymity if you contact them with how much you get paid.
yes i am, and i'm surprised that you take money from people to put out drivel disguised as news. i get giving Hillary a platform. did you vet the info she put out there, or did you blindly do what so many did, just stick an edited propaganda piece out there? that yashir ally piece sullies anyone who touches it. it does not make her look good. the only people who think crowder comes off looking bad there are people who are looking to hurt him.
your piece comes off as a hit piece, and then you get to you in court. nothing but you whining about them taking offense at you using your phone in court. jeez, i wonder why? you act like you're a civil rights activists being abused by the man. seriously, you are being very sleazy and you got what you paid for.
if you wanted to be fair, you would have looked at the yashir's piece a little closer and saw it for what it was and either gleaned what you could with comment, or left it out and did straight commentary on the court case. what you did was slander one and give voice to pure propaganda.
so yeah, do better. have a more discerning eye. try to see what the story is from not only the two sides, but the third and fourth side. there are more than just the two interested parties that have a story to tell.
i love the idea that a stranger can look at an edited 20 sec video and declare that one party is the aggressor and the other the innocent. not just an aggressor but abusive. abusive, not by putting hands on someone, but by saying words. a man is deemed abusive because, on an edited 20 sec video, he used words against the other party.
now that we call him abusive, we can assume that all the, specifically, women who question the narrative are "pick me's" and are hot for his dick and are blind to his "abusive" ways. that all these women are so stupid they have no minds of their own.
you are trite. you have not a leg to stand on. you have no idea what the relationship between crowder and his wife is, none of us do. you want to white knight for Hillary, go for it, leave the rest of us out of it.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Pick me's ARE stupid and have no mind of their own. You're defending an abuser, which makes you just as bad. And if you do become the next Mrs. Crowder, he's going to abuse you too.
I never cared much for Crowder but "Stop the Con" was mostly on the money, as far as I'm concerned. Conservative media and Daily Wire basically sat back and watched the show for two years as covid tyranny overtook the country, for the sake of staying in Big Tech's good graces. It seems pretty relevant to me that the audience be made aware that our conservative "champions" often have their hands tied and are avoiding the most relevant issues of our time to make a buck. So much of the "Stop the Con" Crowder/DW battle was about the side issues of marginal importance (fair pay, "private conversations", loyalty, friendship, etc) that the very important heart of it was mostly discarded.
Great reporting from the Texas newspaper of record
Four lawyers? That's a lot of billable hours to explain to a judge why you weren't personally capable of impregnating your beautiful wife. Hi Steven and Steven's office. I bet Current Revolt will protect your anonymity if you contact them with how much you get paid.
well he absolutely has posted his children on social media so odd to testify he has not....unless these are someone else twins. https://www.instagram.com/p/CSnA1QlrIRF/ https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10159602132521163&set=a.10158307689311163
More like Gayer with Crowdgay
There is so much going on locally in Texas. Let’s stick with that
We are doing as Crowder requested and keeping this open for the public.
Denton County + nationally recognized political commentator = not local?
Omg! I think this is his big man of a lawyer on the left in the photo @divorcing214 @wysocki65. I just may attend the next hearing ;)
this was anything but fair and balanced. do better.
New here?
yes i am, and i'm surprised that you take money from people to put out drivel disguised as news. i get giving Hillary a platform. did you vet the info she put out there, or did you blindly do what so many did, just stick an edited propaganda piece out there? that yashir ally piece sullies anyone who touches it. it does not make her look good. the only people who think crowder comes off looking bad there are people who are looking to hurt him.
your piece comes off as a hit piece, and then you get to you in court. nothing but you whining about them taking offense at you using your phone in court. jeez, i wonder why? you act like you're a civil rights activists being abused by the man. seriously, you are being very sleazy and you got what you paid for.
if you wanted to be fair, you would have looked at the yashir's piece a little closer and saw it for what it was and either gleaned what you could with comment, or left it out and did straight commentary on the court case. what you did was slander one and give voice to pure propaganda.
so yeah, do better. have a more discerning eye. try to see what the story is from not only the two sides, but the third and fourth side. there are more than just the two interested parties that have a story to tell.
That’s great! Or that sucks. Idk I’m not reading all that
a true journalist to the core, no reading comprehension, no attention to detail and no time to learn. yep, you got all the traits to go big.
You’re gonna have to speak up, I can’t hear you over Crowder’s heavy breathing over your shoulder
when you can't answer the accusation, attack the accuser. its a tactic of small minds. good for you, at least we have established you have a mind.
I feel sorry for her husband. Poor Bastard.
FNGs. Go read the about page.
Behind every abusive man is about 20 "pick me" women aspiring to be the next Mrs. Crowder who blindly defend him.
i love the idea that a stranger can look at an edited 20 sec video and declare that one party is the aggressor and the other the innocent. not just an aggressor but abusive. abusive, not by putting hands on someone, but by saying words. a man is deemed abusive because, on an edited 20 sec video, he used words against the other party.
now that we call him abusive, we can assume that all the, specifically, women who question the narrative are "pick me's" and are hot for his dick and are blind to his "abusive" ways. that all these women are so stupid they have no minds of their own.
you are trite. you have not a leg to stand on. you have no idea what the relationship between crowder and his wife is, none of us do. you want to white knight for Hillary, go for it, leave the rest of us out of it.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Pick me's ARE stupid and have no mind of their own. You're defending an abuser, which makes you just as bad. And if you do become the next Mrs. Crowder, he's going to abuse you too.
tell us you're a die hard Jim Conbee fan with out telling us you're a die hard Jim Conbee fan.
Be careful. He's connected to very powerful people. You just don't understand!
Also he knows some kind of Karate, or so I hear
Leaking recorded conversations and text messages that paint the sender in an imperfect light could be a 2nd Tort.
(I’m not a lawyer)
long time subscriber surprised by racial language. lmao okay
I never cared much for Crowder but "Stop the Con" was mostly on the money, as far as I'm concerned. Conservative media and Daily Wire basically sat back and watched the show for two years as covid tyranny overtook the country, for the sake of staying in Big Tech's good graces. It seems pretty relevant to me that the audience be made aware that our conservative "champions" often have their hands tied and are avoiding the most relevant issues of our time to make a buck. So much of the "Stop the Con" Crowder/DW battle was about the side issues of marginal importance (fair pay, "private conversations", loyalty, friendship, etc) that the very important heart of it was mostly discarded.